"AI activities" have a reputation for sounding flat, vocabulary that's slightly off-level, example sentences no one would actually say, the same ten "safe" words every time. That's almost always a prompting problem, not a model problem. Used well, AI removes the tedious part of activity-building while leaving the judgement where it belongs: with you.
Generic output comes from generic prompts
"Make a Spanish vocabulary quiz" will give you a generic Spanish vocabulary quiz. The fix is specificity. A useful brief names:
- Level: a CEFR band (A2, B1…) so the difficulty matches your learner.
- Topic: the actual lesson theme ("ordering food in a restaurant"), not just "vocabulary".
- First language: so distractors and translations target the mistakes your learners make.
- Format and length: "10 multiple-choice questions, one correct answer each".
The difference between "make a quiz" and "make 10 A2 multiple-choice questions on restaurant vocabulary for Spanish learners whose first language is English" is the difference between filler and a usable draft.
Keep a human in the loop
AI is a strong first-drafter and a poor final authority, especially on the things language learners are most sensitive to: register, idiom, and the occasional confidently-wrong answer. Build in a 60-second edit pass:
- Scan for factual or grammatical errors: fix or cut.
- Check register and naturalness: would a native speaker say it?
- Trim anything off-topic or off-level.
This is the part that keeps your voice in the material. The model drafts the boring 80%; you own the 20% that makes it yours.
Use AI for the build, not the pedagogy
AI is best at the mechanical work, generating candidate items, conjugation sets, distractors, example sentences. It's worst at deciding what your specific student needs next. Keep that decision human. Pick the format that fits your goal first (here's how the formats map to learning goals), then let AI fill it.
This is the workflow Lingoken, the game builder for language teachers, is designed around: describe the lesson, get a playable draft in a real game format, then edit before you assign it, rather than copy-pasting a wall of text out of a chat window and rebuilding it by hand.
Used this way, AI doesn't make your teaching generic. It gives you back the hour you'd have spent typing, so you can spend it making the lesson engaging.
The Lingoken Team
Practical guides on building engaging language activities — from the team behind Lingoken, the game builder for language teachers.
Build your first game free
Turn your next lesson into a game your students actually want to play. No credit card, no student logins.